供应链与履约

Netstock:库存预测与规划

Netstock 是库存规划软件,适合已用 ERP 记录库存和订单、但仍靠表格决定采购的团队。它结合销售历史、各地点库存、供应商交期和未完成订单,计算需求、安全库存及补货建议。计划人员调查预计缺货,决定催交已有订单、调拨现有库存还是新增采购,再把审核后的订单送回 ERP 审批。

浏览量
0
使用
0
收藏
0
编辑评分
82/100
支持平台
Web
内容新鲜度
资料更新 · 2026年11月1日

Netstock 功能与使用流程

Netstock 是库存规划软件,适合已用 ERP 记录库存和订单、但仍靠表格决定采购的团队。它结合销售历史、各地点库存、供应商交期和未完成订单,计算需求、安全库存及补货建议。计划人员调查预计缺货,决定催交已有订单、调拨现有库存还是新增采购,再把审核后的订单送回 ERP 审批。

  • 预测与安全库存按每个商品、每个地点分别计算。Netstock 会针对断货期间调整销售历史,并结合需求与供应风险、交期、目标满足率和补货周期确定缓冲库存。因此,安全库存增加可能来自供应商交货不稳定或预测反复偏低,并非统一要求多备货。
  • 看板把已断货、潜在缺货、积压库存和过量在途订单集中到同一规划界面。计划人员可查看具体地点和商品,而不只比较各仓总量。同一 SKU 可能在一个地点库存不足,在另一个地点却超过预测所需库存。
  • AI Opportunities 会区分缺货的处理办法:催交已有订单、从其他地点调入积压库存,或在没有补货安排时紧急采购。计划人员在 Opportunities 页面按地点筛选,通过 Show me 查看建议操作。建议遵守地点访问权限,不会把用户无权访问的地点库存作为调拨来源。
  • 补货使用净库存,即现有库存加已订未收库存,再减去已分配需求。当净库存到达补货触发点时,Netstock 会建议补足交期内需求、安全库存和补货周期所需数量。计划人员可以修改建议,再将其作为待处理订单送入 ERP,继续原有审批流程。
  • Data Quality 检查会标出影响规划的记录,包括非正数成本、负库存、缺失供应商或交期,以及逾期订单。Netstock 会过滤异常并调整规划使用的历史数据,团队仍需修正 ERP 原始记录。使用清理后的历史做预测,并不表示原始交易已被修复。
  • Demand Planning 支持按商品、渠道和地区汇总预测,再将总量分解到规划需要的明细。团队可纳入新品、促销和活动,并跟踪预测表现。这能将销售或促销计划与单品需求衔接起来,并显示实际需求与预测的偏差。
  • Stock Projection 展示商品库存如何随需求消耗与到货变化。计划人员在 Item Inquiry 的 Projection 页签中切换图表和每日明细表,对照已有采购单到货与未来建议到货,并导出数值。发现预计缺货时,需同时查看交货日期和数量;如果已有订单及时到货,可能无需再次采购。

适合谁与使用场景

Netstock 适合已在 ERP 中记录销量、各地点库存、未完成订单和供应商交期,但仍需拼接多张表格来决定补货的采购团队。同一 SKU 在某地点短缺、另一地点积压,或已有在途订单可能及时补足预计缺口时,它能帮助计划人员区分不同处理方式。

计划人员可比较新增采购、调拨现有库存和催交订单,再将审核后的订货量送回 ERP。团队需要有人维护交期和备货政策、修正原始记录错误,并审核拟议订单。Netstock 负责每日计算计划和提示异常,具体采购或调拨建议是否适合业务,仍由这些人员判断。

Netstock 价格与购买条件

Netstock 公布了三档起价:Essentials 每月 $900 起,Advanced 每月 $1,500 起,Commercial 每月 $2,000 起,均为年度订阅。套餐页使用 $ 符号,但未注明具体币种;需在报价中确认币种和付款安排。

库存规划套餐

Essentials 覆盖日常预测与补货;Advanced 增加未来库存推演和解释工具;Commercial 增加装柜与积压库存再分配工具。每档包含前一档功能,应按团队新增的规划工作判断是否升级。

产品或购买选项适用范围公开价格与状态
Essentials

根据 ERP 中的销量、库存、未完成订单和交期,为每个商品、每个地点计算预测、安全库存及补货建议。计划人员查看短缺或积压,调整建议数量,再将选定订单送回 ERP 审批。

套餐所含权益
  • AI Opportunities;综合看板;库存分类组合。
  • 安全库存;预测与订货;管理层看板;供应商绩效。
每月 $900 起;年度订阅。
Advanced

增加 Stock Projection,让计划人员在订货前对照未来需求与预计到货。AI Pack 解释商品库存状态及安全库存的影响因素,并起草供应商邮件;另有高级预测、更长的规划期和自定义报表,支持后续库存规划。

套餐所含权益
  • 包含 Essentials 的全部功能。
  • AI Pack;高级预测;库存推演;更长规划周期;Report Builder 报表工具。
每月 $1,500 起;年度订阅。
Commercial

增加 AI Container Builder,依据商品体积、重量和所选集装箱限制,为供应商订单或配送中心订单提出数量及分柜建议。它计算容量占用,不生成实际装箱摆放图。Excess Redistribution 则建议将积压地点的库存调往需要库存的地点。

套餐所含权益
  • 包含 Advanced 的全部功能。
  • AI Container Builder 装柜规划;积压库存再分配;单点登录(SSO)。
每月 $2,000 起;年度订阅。

Demand Planning 附加项

可选的 Demand Planning 让团队按商品、渠道和地区属性组织预测,并将汇总结果与需求明细衔接。它还覆盖新品、促销及活动规划;该附加项另行报价,不包含在三档套餐公布的起价说明中。

产品或购买选项适用范围公开价格与状态
Demand Planning

计划人员按商品、渠道或地区汇总需求,为新品、促销和活动调整预测,再批准用于后续规划的最终预测。在较高汇总层级所做的调整会分配到下层预测明细,表现视图则用于比较预测与实际需求。

附加项价格需咨询销售。

现行套餐页列出 Essentials、Advanced 和 Commercial,但没有说明旧的 Predictor IA、Predictor IBP 或 Expert 名称与新套餐如何对应,不能仅凭旧名称判断当前包含哪些功能。

书面报价还应确认实施、ERP 连接、支持、税费和续约条款。公开起价不等于某家企业的最终费用。 查看官网价格信息

Netstock 替代方案对比

Netstock、StockIQ 和 Inventory Planner 都支持需求与补货规划。下面的区别主要在于:计划人员如何录入促销或新品假设、覆盖特定期间的预测,以及将建议转成订单。

产品产品范围适合场景与实施责任价格与计费
Netstock当前产品Netstock 利用 ERP 的销量、库存、供应商和订单记录预测需求,并提出补货建议。

适合场景Netstock 的每日 ERP 规划将每个 SKU 与地点的异常对应到补货选择,例如催交订单或调拨积压库存。StockIQ 提供新品向导与促销调整,Inventory Planner 提供按期间覆盖预测和定时批量创建库存订单。这些区别改变计划人员录入假设和发出订单的方式,并不能证明某款工具在所有情况下预测更准。

实施责任团队维护 ERP 数据和交期,审核基于夜间数据更新的规划结果,再决定哪些订单进入 ERP 审批。

StockIQStockIQ 为分销商和制造商提供需求预测、补货和库存调拨。

适合场景面对上新和促销带来的需求变化,StockIQ 提供新品预测向导,并可分别调整历史促销对应的需求记录与未来促销预测。Netstock 公布的 Demand Planning 附加项也覆盖新品和促销,比较重点是这些假设如何录入,以及如何进入补货计划。

实施责任实施团队映射数据并检查数据质量报告;计划人员维护假设,审核订单或调拨建议后再交回 ERP。

StockIQ 规划工作流 ↗

采购前请核对当前计费条件。

根据 ERP、SKU 数、地点与规划复杂度定制报价;Core 与 Enterprise 的套餐范围不同。

官方价格 ↗
Inventory PlannerInventory Planner by Sage 帮助零售采购人员利用销量与库存数据预测需求,规划采购或调拨。

适合场景Inventory Planner 允许采购人员改写特定期间的预测值,该期间随后停止自动重算。它也可以按供应商和仓库筛选,定时批量创建采购单或调拨单。与 Netstock 审核后交回 ERP 的流程相比,操作上的选择是哪些预测期间保留人工数值、哪些库存订单批次按日程创建。

实施责任团队配置预测覆盖、供应商与仓库筛选、订单状态及批次日程。创建的订单会进入 Stock Orders 报表,采购单 PDF 仍需人工发给供应商。

Inventory Planner 库存订单自动化 ↗

采购前请核对当前计费条件。

按所管理库存规模报价的订阅;官方页面说明不限用户数且不额外收费。

官方价格 ↗

选型建议

在可靠库存记录之上改善规划

Netstock 通常每晚导入 ERP 数据,并每天按 SKU 与地点重新计算计划。它结合库存、销量、未完成订单和供应商交期,过滤规划异常,并调整受断货影响的历史。缺货或积压对应到具体商品与地点,计划人员因此可以区分新增采购、逾期未到货及其他地点可用库存。原始记录仍需在 ERP 中修正。

StockIQ 与 Inventory Planner 的规划方式有何不同

Netstock 的每日计划从 ERP 记录出发,突出库存或订单异常。StockIQ 同样基于 ERP 做规划,但还提供新品预测向导,并分别调整历史与未来促销;上新和促销日历明显影响需求时,这些操作值得关注。Inventory Planner 允许采购人员覆盖特定期间的预测,并定时批量创建采购单或调拨单。覆盖后的期间停止自动重算,定时创建库存订单后也仍需人工将 PDF 发送给供应商。

库存运营缺口可先比较 Cin7 与 Finale

Cin7 与 Descartes Finale 处理日常库存和订单操作。如果收货、库存变动或订单记录不准确,应先解决这些操作问题,再加入 Netstock 规划。Cin7 Core 与 Netstock 有现成连接;Cin7 将其列为需要 Integration 附加项的 API 集成。应确认现有订阅是否覆盖这项连接,以及是否需要额外付费。

生产记录与补货决策处理不同工作

Katana 与 Fishbowl 处理物料、生产和仓库操作,产生规划系统需要的记录。Netstock 使用 ERP 记录,包括未完成生产订单和物料清单,计算需求与库存需要。组件显示短缺时,计划人员要先确保生产需求和预计到货已准确记录,再决定新增采购还是催交。Netstock 可以指出规划问题,但不会代替仓库收货,也不会修复生产交易。

Netstock 可集成的第三方工具

NetSuiteNetSuite → Netstock

Netstock 使用 NetSuite 记录对 SKU 进行分类、计算安全库存,并按供应商提出订单建议。采购人员可按体积或金额约束调整拟议订单,交易记录仍保留在 NetSuite。接入时需明确该连接的字段映射、导入时间安排及订单回传步骤。

Netstock 与 NetSuite 的集成 ↗
Cin7 CoreCin7 Core → Netstock

该连接提取 Cin7 Core 记录,供 Netstock 做预测、库存分类与补货规划,减少为这些计算反复导出表格的工作。Cin7 将 Netstock 列为需要 Integration 附加项的 API 集成;订阅需包含该集成能力,具体订单回传流程也需在接入时明确。

Netstock 与 Cin7 Core 的集成 ↗
SAP Business OneSAP Business One → Netstock

Netstock 分析 SAP Business One 记录,按销售金额与周转速度划分库存 SKU,评估供应商表现,并计算单品安全库存。这些规划结果有助于说明新增订单前应先关注哪些商品。该连接的具体刷新时间及订单回传能力需在接入时明确;通用的夜间导入说明不能视为该连接的精确规格。

Netstock 与 SAP Business One 的集成 ↗

Netstock 常见问题

Netstock 使用导入的 ERP 记录计算计划,由团队决定将哪些订单送回 ERP。数据更新时间、预计到货和地点权限,有助于解释为什么规划建议可能与 ERP 中看到的库存数字不同。

Netstock 多久更新一次 ERP 数据?

Netstock 的通用数据说明提到,每晚会复制 ERP 数据、每天会重新计算,并非实时同步。具体时间、读取字段和异常处理方式,需要根据所用的 ERP 连接器确认。

Netstock 会自动下采购单吗?

它会计算补货建议,计划人员可以审核、修改,或用人工填写的数量替换系统建议。由人工将选定的订单发送回 ERP 后,订单会以待处理状态继续走原有审批流程。催单或取消订单的建议本身不会修改供应商订单。

Netstock 能自动修正库存或供应商数据吗?

Netstock 会标出缺失交期、无效成本和异常库存记录等问题,但原始 ERP 数据仍需团队修正。预测仍依赖可用的销售历史和规划设置。

Predictor IA 和 IBP 还是当前套餐名称吗?

当前公开套餐为 Essentials、Advanced 和 Commercial,另有可选的 Demand Planning 附加项。Netstock 曾在早期资料中使用 Predictor IA 和 IBP,但现行页面没有公布准确对应关系。应以当前方案列出的功能为准,不要直接将旧名称视为同一套餐。

Netstock 的起价是多少?

Netstock 公布了三档起价:Essentials 每月 $900 起,Advanced 每月 $1,500 起,Commercial 每月 $2,000 起,均为年度订阅。套餐页使用 $ 符号,但未注明具体币种;需在报价中确认币种和付款安排。

为什么预计缺货,却没有建议订货量?

已有采购单可能恰好能及时到货,再下一单会重复补货。计划人员可在 Projection 页签比较已确定的到货安排、需求日期和期初库存;逾期销售订单会立即扣减期初库存。该视图使用最近一次导入的数据,因此导入后发生的到货或订单修改尚不会体现。

为什么 AI Opportunities 没有显示另一个仓库?

Opportunities 遵守用户的地点访问权限。若用户无权访问有积压库存的地点,Netstock 不会建议把该处库存调往缺货地点。屏蔽某个地点也会隐藏该地点的建议;按区域订货时,还需为该区域启用 Show AI Opportunities。因此,没有建议不等于其他地方没有可用库存。

参考来源

Netstock 帮助中心说明安全库存、补货触发点、库存推演和 AI Opportunities。套餐页列明各档权益与起价,集成页则介绍各 ERP 连接支持的规划工作。

用户评论

Netstock 评论区汇集 G2、Capterra、TrustRadius 的来源链接与已收录反馈,各来源所对应的产品范围分别注明。

182 条评论核验于 2026年10月31日

G2 上的 Netstock 产品评论页。

Jasheek J.
Netstock Makes Inventory Planning Faster and More Visible

As a Product Manager, Netstock has made my day-to-day work much easier. Instead of spending hours digging through reports and spreadsheets to understand our stock position, I can quickly see what needs attention and take action. Having all the key insights in one place helps me spot potential issues early and identify opportunities to improve availability and inventory performance. The time I save on manual analysis allows me to focus more on supporting customers, working with suppliers, and driving the business forward. The only downside is that it takes a bit of time to learn all the features. Once I got comfortable with the platform, though, it became a real time-saver and gave me much better visibility into our inventory planning. Netstock helps take the guesswork out of inventory planning. It makes it much easier to spot potential stock issues, stay on top of demand, and make decisions faster without having to go through multiple spreadsheets and reports.

Noah D.发布于 2026年10月12日
Responsive team, but a nine-month implementation never delivered the value we were sold

The customer success team was generally responsive and professional throughout our implementation. Jameson, in particular, stayed engaged for a very long implementation period and continued trying to solve problems as they arose. Netstock also responded promptly when issues were raised, and their leadership ultimately offered additional resources, reporting support, and further training in an effort to help us extract more value from the platform. The issue was never a lack of effort from the individuals assigned to our account. The biggest issue was the gap between what we believed we were buying during the sales process and what the platform was ultimately able to deliver in our environment. We are a manufacturing/distribution company running Microsoft Dynamics NAV. Our ERP has some complexity around units of measure, assemblies, BOMs, and purchasing logic, but I would not characterize our environment as unusually complex for a business of our type. The implementation became an extremely long process centered around data validation, extract modifications, configuration changes, and repeated questions about whether the recommendations could actually be trusted. Roughly nine months into a twenty-four-month agreement, Netstock was still describing us as only then beginning a six-week “Active Use” phase prior to onboarding completion. Netstock also stated that earlier sessions should not really be counted as true Use Phase sessions. That is very different from the implementation experience we believed we were purchasing. We also encountered product limitations that were material to the way our business operates. These included issues involving fractional units of measure and BOM conversions. At one point the system produced an obviously unusable recommendation with approximately $27 million of model value for shrink wrap. Netstock worked on fixes, and some issues were attributable to decisions or changes on our side, but the cumulative effect was that our users lost confidence in the recommendations. Once users stop trusting a planning system, adoption becomes extremely difficult. That became the central issue for us. At approximately $2,400 per month, Netstock needed to provide a meaningful improvement over what we were already able to accomplish internally with Excel, Jet Reports, and direct ERP data. It never cleared that bar. We were also billed throughout the extended implementation. Netstock acknowledged in writing that its own technical backlog and staffing situation contributed to slower delivery, while also correctly identifying areas where BCW contributed to the complexity. We continued trying to make the product work well beyond the point where confidence had started to erode because we genuinely wanted the implementation to succeed. Ultimately, after concluding that the platform was not going to become a meaningful part of our procurement process, we asked Netstock for an early commercial exit. We did not ask for our implementation fee back. We did not ask for a refund of subscription fees already paid. We simply asked to stop paying the remaining term for a product that had not delivered sufficient value for our business. Netstock reviewed the request multiple times, including with senior customer success and finance leadership, and declined both an early release and any financial compromise. Their final position was that they were not permitting customers to exit contracts early given current economic conditions. That was particularly disappointing after such a long and unsuccessful implementation. Netstock is intended to improve forecasting, replenishment planning, inventory visibility, and purchasing decisions. For businesses whose operating model fits the platform well, I can see how those capabilities could be valuable. In our case, however, the incremental value never became substantial enough to justify the subscription cost, implementation effort, or ongoing organizational attention. The underlying problem was confidence. Once our purchasing users repeatedly encountered recommendations that appeared unreliable, getting them to depend on the system became increasingly difficult.

Todd N.
Simplified NetSuite Integration and a Great Demand Planning UI/UX

Simplified Netsuite integration! Great UI/UX for demand planning. Simply put.....Nothing stands out that we don't like. Improving working capital efficiency via better planning visibility for us and our suppliers, who subsequently approved lower MOQ's, further improving our inventory & working capital efficiency.

在 G2 查看更多评论

发表评论

请先为每一项打分,再分享你的真实使用体验。

任务有效性
易用性
稳定性
工作流适配度
性价比