BrazeAI:AI 辅助客户互动
BrazeAI 帮助营销团队制作营销活动,并为不同顾客选择内容、触达渠道和发送时间。其中,Decisioning Studio 负责从准备好的选项中持续作出选择;团队仍要确定目标、提供内容并检查效果。
- 浏览量
- 0
- 使用
- 0
- 收藏
- 0
- 编辑评分
- 78/100
BrazeAI 功能与使用流程
BrazeAI 是 Braze 客户营销平台中的一组 AI 工具。Decisioning Studio 从团队准备的选项中,为每位顾客选择发送内容和时间;Operator 则帮助运营人员创建营销活动和内容。两者承担的工作不同,选型时应先明确团队希望减少哪部分人工工作。
- Decisioning Studio Go 用于持续、重复发送的邮件项目。团队提供邮件主题、引导点击的文案和图片,Go 为每位收件人选择组合与发送时间,以真实点击为优化目标。每周或每月发送几次由团队设定,Go 只在允许的日期和时间内安排发送。
- Decisioning Studio Pro 可围绕下单、收入或其他明确的业务目标作决策。它能使用企业自己的客户数据,并在不同渠道、优惠及其他已配置的选项之间选择。Braze 专业团队协助设计和配置项目,商家仍要提供目标、数据、可用选项和业务限制。
- BrazeAI Operator 根据自然语言指令,帮助运营人员创建内容、营销活动、客户分组和 Canvas 流程。Canvas 是 Braze 中安排消息发送顺序与条件的工具。Operator 协助制作,Decisioning Studio 则持续为不同顾客作出选择。
适合谁
- 已使用 Braze 持续发送邮件,并花费较多时间测试不同顾客所需内容组合的团队。
- 有明确的收入或转化目标、可用客户数据,并能安排人员与 Braze 共同实施 Pro 项目的团队。
不适合谁
- 邮件名单较小,或活动很短、点击不足的项目。Braze 建议 Go 的受众至少为 20,000 人;这不是硬性门槛,但更小的受众学习较慢。
- 希望系统包办全部内容制作和营销工作的团队。Decisioning Studio 从已有选项中选择,内容、业务限制和效果仍需人员持续管理。
BrazeAI 费用与使用条件
BrazeAI 能力通过 Braze 平台及相关产品采购。Platform Editions 与 Decisioning Studio 的产品范围不同,需要在订单中分别确认。
Braze 平台版本
| 产品或购买选项 | 适用范围 | 公开价格与状态 |
|---|---|---|
| Braze Go | 激活客户数据并启动跨渠道营销。 套餐所含权益
| 价格需咨询销售。 |
| Braze Select | 管理更多渠道和团队成员。 套餐所含权益
| 价格需咨询销售。 |
| Braze Pro | 使用预测 AI 与个性化推荐。 套餐所含权益
| 价格需咨询销售。 |
| Braze Enterprise | 开展企业规模的客户互动。 套餐所含权益
| 价格需咨询销售。 |
BrazeAI Decisioning Studio
| 产品或购买选项 | 适用范围 | 公开价格与状态 |
|---|---|---|
| Decisioning Studio Go | 利用 Braze 邮件互动数据,在持续邮件项目中以真实点击为优化目标。 套餐所含权益
| 价格需咨询销售。 |
| Decisioning Studio Pro | 使用客户数据,围绕明确的业务目标作跨渠道决策。 套餐所含权益
| 价格需咨询销售。 |
平台价格随月活跃用户数变化。Action Credits 可用于渠道及部分 BrazeAI 产品;单价、额度与 Decisioning Studio 的购买依赖需询价确认。 查看官网价格信息
BrazeAI 替代方案对比
已使用 Braze 的团队,应先比较增加 Decisioning Studio 与继续使用账户中现有测试工具的差别。尚未选平台时,Klaviyo 和 Iterable 也有为不同顾客作选择的功能。下表说明它们能替代哪些具体任务,不能据此认定它们与 Pro 的所有决策能力一一对应。
| 产品 | 产品范围 | 适合场景与实施责任 | 价格与计费方式 |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrazeAI + Braze Customer Engagement Platform当前产品 | Braze 负责协调各渠道的客户消息,Decisioning Studio 则在 Go 或 Pro 的功能范围内,为不同顾客选择内容和时间。 | 适合场景Go 适合以点击为目标的持续邮件项目;若涉及收入目标、更多客户数据和跨渠道选择,可评估 Pro。已使用 Braze 的团队,可先评估这些新增能力,再决定是否有必要更换平台。 实施责任团队准备受众、候选内容和业务限制。Braze 专业人员协助设计和配置 Pro 项目。现有数据连接可能可以复用,但自动决策的配置和维护仍需有人负责。 | 套餐与价格 |
| Klaviyo | Klaviyo 是电商营销平台,可根据店铺订单和顾客行为发送消息并自动跟进。 | 适合场景从客户跟进做起的 Shopify 团队,可以先比较 Klaviyo 的店铺连接和消息营销工具。Personalized Send Time 可在邮件、短信、推送和 WhatsApp 活动中,为每位顾客选择时间。它解决发送时机问题,不能据此认定其等同于 Pro 的全部组合决策。 实施责任团队仍需连接店铺数据、制作内容并设置自动化。Personalized Send Time 当前用于营销活动,不适用于自动化流程,且至少要提前一天安排。它需要 Personalization 或 Advanced KDP,不能默认基础邮件订阅已经包含。 | 公开价格邮件费用随活跃客户档案数量变化;短信及其他消息用量可能另行收费。 计费口径Personalized Send Time 需要 Personalization 或 Advanced KDP。比较费用时应同时核对该套餐和消息发送方案,不能只看入门邮件价格。 Klaviyo 套餐与价格 |
| Iterable | Iterable 是客户消息营销平台,可在营销流程中为每位顾客选择邮件、短信或推送。 | 适合场景如果主要任务是在营销流程中为顾客选择发送渠道,可以比较 Iterable。Channel Decisioning 支持邮件、短信和推送;它解决的是具体的渠道选择问题,不能据此认定它能以同样方式组合 Pro 的所有决策。 实施责任团队仍需准备各渠道内容并配置营销流程。Iterable 建议具备三个月的活动数据和至少两个活跃渠道。Channel Decisioning 不能与 Send Time Decisioning 同时使用,因此渠道与发送时间的需求应分别核对。 | |
| Bloomreach Autonomous Marketing | Autonomous Marketing 把客户数据、营销自动化、分析与个性化结合起来。电商搜索和购物代理属于单独的产品。 | 适合场景适合希望把客户数据与营销工作放在一起管理的团队。这里比较的是营销产品,购买它不等于同时获得同厂商的搜索或购物产品。 实施责任团队接入客户记录与购物行为,再用这些数据建立人群与营销活动。所选渠道和套餐决定实际采购范围。 | 公开价格定制报价;价格页说明采用年度订阅。 计费口径费用受所选套餐、受众规模与消息容量影响。Bloomreach 支持不同计费模型,具体口径以合同为准;Loomi Marketing Agent 是单独计价的附加项。 Bloomreach 价格说明 |
| Brevo Marketing Platform | 提供邮件、自动化和按套餐开放的消息渠道。Standard 扩展自动化范围,Professional 再增加 WhatsApp、移动推送等能力。 | 适合场景适合先做邮件跟进,再按需要增加渠道的团队。入门套餐的价格并不覆盖产品功能清单中的所有渠道。 实施责任运营人员管理联系人和自动化规则。Free 与 Starter 的自动化最多覆盖 2,000 个联系人;Standard 取消这一自动化联系人限制,但仍有联系人存储档位。 | 公开价格Free 为每月 $0;Starter 每月 $9 起;Standard 每月 $18 起;Professional 每月 $499 起;Enterprise 为定制报价。 计费口径Free 每天可发 300 封邮件;Starter 与 Standard 从每月 5,000 封、存储 500 个联系人起;Professional 从每月 150,000 封起。短信和 WhatsApp 点数另购。 Brevo 官方套餐与额度 |
| HubSpot Marketing Hub | 以 CRM 客户档案为中心,承接获客、邮件跟进和营销自动化。Professional 增加范围更广的营销活动自动化与报表功能。 | 适合场景适合希望营销与销售共用客户记录、衔接跟进工作的团队。这与完整替换 Braze 所用的所有网站和 App 消息渠道是不同的采购目标。 实施责任团队维护 CRM 客户记录,并设置哪些联系人计入营销联系人额度。自动化范围、包含席位与上线服务要求取决于 Marketing Hub 套餐。 | 公开价格Professional 年付时每月 $800 起;签订年度合约但按月付款时每月 $890 起;Enterprise 每月 $3,600 起。 计费口径Professional 包含 2,000 个营销联系人、3 个 Core Seats,并另收必需的 $3,000 上线服务费;Enterprise 包含 10,000 个营销联系人、5 个 Core Seats,并另收 $7,000 上线服务费。额外联系人、席位和点数用量可能增加费用。 HubSpot Marketing Hub 官方价格 |
金额保留官网币种与付款条件。席位、活跃用户、客户档案和发送量对应不同计费口径,表中起价不能直接当作可比较的总预算。
选型建议
已使用 Braze:先看哪项决策最费时间
只需要比较两个邮件主题时,Braze 现有的活动测试功能可能已经够用。若长期邮件项目需要为不同收件人持续选择内容和时间,才值得评估 Go。目标涉及收入、企业自有客户数据或跨渠道选择时,应进一步评估 Pro。小团队还要判断,这些新增能力是否值得投入持续准备和维护的人力。
持续邮件项目中,AI 和运营各做什么
以每周向老顾客发送邮件为例,这只是流程示意,并非客户案例。运营人员选择收件人,准备邮件主题、图片和链接,再设定每周的发送安排。Go 为每人选择内容组合与时间,通过 Braze 发出邮件,并根据真实点击继续学习。上线前的内容检查和后续素材维护仍由团队负责;Go 不负责撰写候选内容,也不会自行改变固定发送频次。
怎样判断 Go 是否有效
Go 会保留一组对照顾客,在相同发送规则下,随机使用同一批候选内容。这些顾客照样收到邮件,因此比较的是 AI 选择与随机选择的差别,而不是发邮件与不发邮件的差别。对照组至少占受众的 5%。Braze 建议等系统完成训练后再判断效果;点击增加本身不能证明订单或利润增加。
用户反馈:部分测试可自动完成,维护仍要人做
2026 年 9 月的 G2 评论中,Connor G. 提到可测试更多组合,也指出初次配置较复杂。另一位用户表示,管理模型和判断实际新增效果仍需花时间。G2 标注这两条评论来自激励活动,评论也未明确使用的是 Go 还是 Pro。2024 年的评论描述的是早期 OfferFit,可帮助了解当时的服务支持和反馈较慢的问题,不能直接代表当前 Go 的使用体验。
Kayo Sports 案例能说明什么
据 Braze 发布的案例,Kayo Sports 将约 300 种沟通选项扩展到 120 万种个性化组合,覆盖邮件、短信、推送和 App 内消息。项目将 Decisioning Studio、客户数据相关工作和四条分别负责不同渠道的 Canvas 流程结合起来。这说明复杂跨渠道项目可以落地,不能当作 Go 的邮件效果,也不代表 120 万名顾客。该厂商案例未单独测出 Decisioning Studio 对销售或留存的贡献,因此不能据此预测其他店铺的收益。
先分清是选营销平台,还是增加自动决策
尚未选定邮件和消息营销平台的 Shopify 店铺,可以先比较 Klaviyo,再判断是否需要实施 Braze。需要协调邮件、短信和 App 消息的团队,也可把 Iterable 放入候选。若已经使用 Braze,增加自动决策与更换整个平台是两种不同的项目。上方对比表分别说明产品能作哪些选择,以及团队仍需准备的内容、数据和配置。
BrazeAI 可集成的第三方工具
Braze 的 Shopify 应用可将客户、订单及店铺行为事件传入 Braze 工作区。使用 BrazeAI 的团队可通过这项平台连接接入店铺数据;并非每个 AI 模块各有独立连接器。需安装应用并为店铺配置事件采集。
官方连接说明BrazeAI 常见问题
Go 能直接优化订单或收入吗?
Go 当前的自助版本以真实邮件点击为目标,会过滤自动化点击和退订相关点击。若主要目标是订单、收入或客户长期价值,应评估 Pro,并确认转化数据和测量方法。点击提升不能替代这些经营结果。
Go 会使用数据仓库中的数据,或选择要推荐的商品吗?
Go 从 Braze 中的目标受众、邮件互动和准备好的素材选项中学习,不使用自定义客户属性或数据仓库中的数据来学习。若要结合更广泛的企业自有数据选择商品或优惠,应评估 Pro;Braze 的其他推荐与数据工具也有各自的功能范围。
BrazeAI Operator 与 Decisioning Studio 做的是同一件事吗?
Operator 根据自然语言指令,帮助运营人员创建和处理营销活动、内容、客户分组及 Canvas 流程。Decisioning Studio 则在持续发送过程中,为每位顾客从准备好的选项中作出选择。内容制作与持续选择是两项不同的工作。
自动决策能控制优惠预算和联系频次吗?
Pro 可在设定的预算内优化优惠,也可在控制退订率的条件下优化发送频次。项目中的具体限制仍需团队确定。Go 采用团队选定的固定频次,并可应用工作区的频次上限;它不会自行选择不同的发送频次。
官方资料:Decisioning Studio Go · Go setup · Go FAQ · Decisioning Studio · BrazeAI
参考来源
用户评论
G2 上的 Braze AI Decisioning Studio 精确产品页面。
Expertise and team service. Innovative spirit Nothing especific. Room for improvement in partnering strategically Acceleration of business transactions. Better more personalized experiences at sacel
I like that Braze AI Decisioning Studio allows me to personalize interactions on a one-to-one level, moving beyond the impersonal many-to-one approaches we used in the past. It helps me understand which agents have the most impact, as well as identify relevant features for each customer, enabling me to measure uplift against my business as usual program. Additionally, I appreciate being able to understand the specific times of day, days of the week, frequency, channels, and content types that impact our customers on an individual level, something we couldn't do with our previous customer data solution. There are a few areas where Braze AI Decisioning Studio could improve for us. One thing that's been a bit tricky is that while we can see the uplift, it's challenging to understand the incremental nature of that uplift without additional analysis. We also find ourselves spending a lot of time managing the model, and if we want to make changes like reducing our frequency, we end up having to do a champion-challenger setup to reintroduce changes. It feels unexpectedly complex; I thought it would be easier to manage such changes. Braze AI Decisioning Studio™ allows me to personalize interactions at a one-to-one level, deeply understanding customer impact by time, channel, and content, which was impossible with our prior system.
Braze 客户互动平台页面;评论覆盖包含 BrazeAI 能力的完整 Braze 平台,并非仅评价 AI Decisioning Studio。
Braze is constantly coming out with new features that make CRM more efficient and advanced. There's always something new to explore and improve our CRM program. These features sometimes come with an additional cost and without being able to test it and have a proof of concept it's hard to sell to decision makers. It would be great if we could test the features as a trial beforehand and build a business case to present. We've been able to manage the customer lifecycle way more efficiently. We used to have 3 different places to manage email, SMS and push notifications but since we've migrated everything to Braze it's way easier to manage the full customer lifestyle in one place.
I've been using Braze for over three years now and compared to other tools, it offers an intuitive and user-friendly interface. At my company Braze is our only customer engagement platform and it's covered all our different use cases across multiple channels (push notifications, email, in-app messages, and content cards). I particularly like the advanced segmentation features which allow us to customize our targeting in highly specific ways. Braze offers a lot of features which can feel overwhelming for new users at first. There are several ways to accomplish the same task which isn’t a bad thing but does require some learning to figure out the best approach for each scenario. We use Braze in CRM to engage our customers with our brand at the right time across different channels. Automated journeys help us reduce manual work and create a smoother customer experience.
4 points I love the most about Braze. Firstly, the help of Customer Success Manager and support team. They're always quick and genuinely involved into finding a solution for any tricky use case. Secondly, the platform allows lots of customisation (e.g. with liquid logic, key value pairs etc.). Thirdly, Braze is continuously improving. Clients are welcome to leave product feedback and it is actually implemented. Lastly, speed. Braze works smoothly and that saves lots of nerve to the CRM managers. Limited analytics & pricing transparency, specifically for the SMS channel. It's hard to analyse the overall volume and cost of SMS sent from Braze in the past as well as predict it for the future. The pricing is, however, based on detailed future predictions. Building automated personalised communications with clients across multiple channels.
Braze 客户互动平台页面;评论覆盖完整 Braze 平台,并非仅评价 AI Decisioning Studio。
Has been great overall. Has made a huge impact on our business and still have some work to do to continue to improve that.
Overall, having Braze as part of the tech stack where I work has been a net positive. The layout is intuitive, easy to use and well defined. Braze documentation on their website is pretty detailed and helpful, and their dedicated solutions consultants are quite helpful. Overall a useful CRM tool, with good UI/UX and overall good experience, with a few key areas for small improvement
Its overall fine, I think it suits the business needs well. However, the SMS product needs improving and strategic guidance from internal staff.
Braze 客户互动平台页面;评论覆盖完整 Braze 平台,并非仅评价 AI Decisioning Studio。
We use Braze as our primary cross channel marketing communications platform to send email & SMS campaigns, in addition to using it for automated journeys triggered by user actions on our app. We also use Braze for ad hoc communications such as In App and push messages that are easier to launch within the platform as opposed to developing within our product.
Braze is where all our marketing and transactional communication lives. We send emails and SMS in automations, batch sends, and lifecycle journeys. Braze helps with acquisition and customer journeys.
I use Braze to run our NPS survey programme. It has custom built integration with Iterate, the survey platform we use to build NPS, and it works seamlessly. All the responses are instantly transmitted to Braze and get populated against every user. Using that data, we have managed to build performance evaluation dashboards for our sales team with data getting updated in real time without needing any manual intervention. Options to experiment using tools like Intelligent Timing have allowed us to achieve more than 20% response rate. In addition, I also use Braze's Audience Sync to dynamically sync our existing customer lists with Facebook and Google Ads, allowing us to exclude them from prospecting campaigns and also create powerful lookalike audiences, making the overall ad spend a lot more efficient.
Braze 客户互动平台页面;评论覆盖包含 BrazeAI 能力的完整 Braze 平台,并非仅评价 AI Decisioning Studio。
What is our primary use case? I have implemented Braze, trained people on it, and set up automated journeys in Braze using Canvas, the CDI Sync via data warehouses, and created custom journeys based on different types of use cases, utilizing Braze to a very large extent. One of the journeys I set up in Braze involved an RFM score built via a data science model residing in the data warehouse that is sent on a specific cadence for a certain number of users, pulling in data via the CDI Sync in Braze from the data warehouse, allowing for updates to specific attributes for users, which results in customized messaging such as emails, in-app messages, content cards, or SMS at specific times using Braze's Intellisense sending, thus providing messages tailored to their RFM score. I have multiple use cases with Braze, including dynamically created reports customized for specific customer requests related to different funds at BetaShares, which previously involved manual input. Now the information dynamically updates based on the fund requested, using a CDI Sync via an API from the data warehouse, which keeps it running automatically without manual intervention. How has it helped my organization? Before I joined BetaShares, they had been using Braze for three years after migrating from another tool called Marketo, where frustrations arose due to a lack of proper use, leading to non-customized and static email campaigns. Upon my arrival, I have since customized the campaigns based on user attributes, resulting in an increase of about 28% in user opens and a significant click-through rate jump by over 48%. Contributing to the jump in click-through rates involves multiple factors such as design changes and customized content based on user segmentation. What is most valuable? Some of the best features Braze offers are not just the features themselves but the integrations with other tools like Mparticle, Segment, Rudderstack, High-touch, and others, along with powerful new features like AI Decisioning and the ability to create Canvas journeys that can communicate with external tools using webhook functionality, making data handling very efficient by allowing the use of specific attributes while also removing unnecessary ones. The integrations in Braze are very good. However, I acknowledge that I am likely a very advanced user, making the learning curve steep for many new users. Once fully understood, though, it is quite powerful and easy to use. I advise that practical experience is often more beneficial than just reading the documentation, which can sometimes leave users expecting to understand Braze without hands-on interaction. What needs improvement? Braze could improve its documentation regarding functionalities. While I enjoy the AI Operator feature, I believe there should be a clearer verification method to ensure that the operator executes tasks correctly. Additionally, I have found Braze's reporting functionalities somewhat lacking as we often rely on Amplitude for comprehensive reporting. Braze support is generally very good, but I feel the onboarding process could be enhanced, especially for clients investing significant sums, to guarantee they get maximum value from the tool, thereby preventing any awareness concerns from financial officers regarding tool usage and effectiveness. To attain a perfect score, improvements in the onboarding process would be necessary, allowing users to adapt more easily to Braze's functionalities without incurring extra service fees for onboarding. I believe we have covered a significant amount already, unless there are specific improvements we have not yet addressed. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using Braze for over four years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? I find Braze to be very stable, with no issues observed during its usage. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? Scalability is exceptional with Braze, allowing us the flexibility to grow without constraints that could hinder our operations. How are customer service and support? Customer support has been great overall. We did experience some difficulties with our previous Customer Success Manager, but the rest of the team has performed excellently. I rate customer support as an eight due to experiences with the previous CSM's response times. Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? The previous platform we used was Marketo, which was phased out because our team deemed it inadequate for our evolving requirements. My involvement commenced a couple of years after the switch to Braze, which provides a superior fit for our event-based architecture and extensive integration needs. What was our ROI? While I cannot disclose specific metrics regarding cost savings or time efficiency due to contractual constraints, we have transitioned to require fewer employees after enhancing our automated functionalities. Since my involvement with Braze, we have seen time savings translating to around 10 to 12 full-time employee hours annually, with projections for even greater savings as we optimize usage further. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? My experience with Braze's pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been largely positive. Having personally managed contracts, I employed various strategies to adjust our agreement favorably, ensuring we attained the necessary functionalities without incurring excessive expenses. Which other solutions did I evaluate? I do not know if evaluations of other solutions occurred prior to Braze's selection. However, the ultimate choice was made by our CEO, who values Braze's extensive capabilities, particularly for in-app messaging and comprehensive personalization, features that competing tools like Iterable struggle to deliver. What other advice do I have? I would rate Braze an eight or nine out of ten, primarily due to the onboarding challenges for newer users and the lack of included onboarding in the pricing. My overall rating for this review is nine out of ten. Concerning Braze's AI capabilities, the discussion around governance and security feels premature since the rapid evolution of AI makes it difficult to predict how these aspects will hold up in future developments. While Braze's AI capabilities are impressive, it is not infallible. Thus, diligent data governance is necessary to manage potential issues concerning personal data security. I find Braze's accuracy is quite good. While not perfect, it generally performs better than average when benchmarked against human output, especially concerning AI Decisioning features integrated into Braze that enhance personalization capabilities. We utilize Snowflake as our cloud provider. I advise others to clarify their specific usage needs before adopting Braze and prioritize establishing direct connections to a data warehouse for an efficient data flow over intermediary systems. Proper training and knowledge of Braze's functionalities ahead of integration can ensure immediate and significant value. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? Private Cloud If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use? Other
What is our primary use case? My main use case for Braze is Canvas, which is Braze's flow creator, and I also use the email and push sender extensively. I use Braze for sending specific email blasts that did not necessarily need to go through a journey, as well as for building retention journeys and personalization initiatives. I also use the data functionality to analyze the results of the blasts we conducted. The reporting and analytics functionality in Braze was something I used in very specific ways to examine the results of blasts, but I did not always end up using it because we had an external dashboard that consolidated all the impacts we made. How has it helped my organization? Braze has positively impacted my organization by directly helping to increase LTV and retention and by helping with the independence of the marketing team. Having an intuitive tool with its surrounding functionalities helped achieve these goals. Braze helps me significantly with reducing the time of operationalization compared to other tools we previously used, mainly because of the ease and intuitiveness of the tool. What is most valuable? The best features Braze offers include the flow creator, Canvas, as it is very intuitive and easy to manage to integrate all contact channels, especially if the company's data is well structured. I also find the interface really nice and easy to use compared to other tools on the market. The specific tool in Braze that helps me achieve my marketing goals is the email and push sender, which I used most frequently. I appreciate the push notification feature for its ability to pull user data when sending the push based on people's behaviors, allowing me to do segmentation within the tool itself. The fact that it handled images, GIFs, and included interactive buttons was also really cool. However, I found that we needed substantial dependence on developers, so we needed to have engineering very well set up to capture all the event tokens. I am referring to location-based features in Braze, and I thought these features were extremely strategic for the campaign we were creating, mainly because we could create physical points on the map or mobility dynamics, which added a lot to what we were building. However, it was not something we used that often. The personalization capability in Braze is very good, as I find it very easy to personalize, especially in specific blasts where we could personalize at the time of sending. This was really cool, unlike other tools where I would have to create a new data extension with all this data. The mobile experience with Braze is good and easy to use. The segmentation feature in Braze is very easy, and as I mentioned before, that was one of the positive points, enabling me to use the segmentation part in specific blasts, which would be more complicated in other tools. What needs improvement? Braze could be improved by adding video lesson tools, similar to what HubSpot does, as I find that regarding tutorials and information about Braze, it is somewhat difficult to access. I found the original format of reporting and analytics in Braze to be easy to use, but not very complete. This is why it did not meet all our needs, and it did not make sense for us to use only it since we needed data that came from outside Braze. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using Braze for one year. What do I think about the stability of the solution? From my experience, Braze is very stable and has been reliable on a day-to-day basis. Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? In the company itself, we had several similar solutions, and we did not use only Braze. I am not certain why we specifically chose Braze, as I was not the one who integrated it. How was the initial setup? I was not the one who integrated Braze; I only operated the tool, mainly on the marketing side. Therefore, I am not certain how to answer about the ease of integration. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? It was not my responsibility to take care of the pricing, setup cost, and licensing aspect. I did not find out if the setup cost and pricing were straightforward or confusing. Which other solutions did I evaluate? Before choosing Braze, I did not evaluate other options. What other advice do I have? Braze is a good tool that has many configurations inside that allow us to solve day-to-day problems. However, Braze is not as widespread, and information about it is not as easy to access as with other tools. Regarding Braze's AI capabilities, I do not have strong knowledge regarding governance and security, as I did not focus on that aspect when I used it. Regarding Braze's AI capabilities, I believe it meets expectations in terms of accuracy and reliability of output, even though it was not a feature I used. I would rate Braze a seven out of ten. Which deployment model are you using for this solution? Hybrid Cloud If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use? Amazon Web Services (AWS) Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
What is our primary use case? Braze's main use case for our organization is marketing automation, creating automated workflows triggered with action-based logic. I can discuss the abandoned cart canvas, or the cart reminder with personalized products. Braze is very useful for this type of workflow since it allows me to insert personalized data using Liquid content, and it is straightforward once you master the Liquid logic. I use Braze on a day-to-day basis for one-off campaigns as part of our marketing plan, and it is very handy because it allows me to put forward offers from Braze catalogs, which are directly linked to our data warehouse. We also use it on a day-to-day basis to run analysis, whether simple or more complex. I also find the SQL query builder very helpful when I want to run deeper segment analysis or a user's behavior analysis. What is most valuable? The best feature that Braze offers is Canvas, which has many components including action paths, audience paths, delays, user updates, decision splits, send to destination, and feature flags. I also value all of the analysis features that Braze has, such as email performance, the deliverability center connected to Postmaster and Microsoft SNDS, the report builder, and many other report features that are very useful. I rely most on Canvases, Connected Content, and Liquid code because all of this, combined with cloud data ingestion and the synchronization between our data warehouse, BigQuery, and Looker, makes it very easy to use our backend data without overly complex development. Thanks to Braze and particularly the training and learning paths that exist within Braze Lab, it is very easy to get trained and practice whenever needed or when I have more time. Even though the learning paths are very long, I found the certifications very useful because they force you to master the tool and to really engage with it and practice hands-on. One of the very positive impacts that Braze has had on our organization is how easy it is to train, practice, and how clear the documentation is. What needs improvement? Braze still has some improvements to make on the user interface. Sometimes it is lagging and taking time to load pages when I have many Canvases or campaigns open. I have also noticed that sometimes in the email performance dashboard, when selecting tags or Canvases, the interface is a bit buggy. When we send too much data or large amounts of data, the interface is not as fast as expected and can be somewhat frustrating, but nothing really blocks us. Regarding support, I can definitely say from my experience that sometimes the technical support is very helpful and provides answers that I would not have guessed without their help because the information is not appearing in the documentation, or it is just very easy and fast for Braze technical support and experts to find the solution to our issue. However, I feel this was more fluent in the past, roughly five to eight years ago. Following the years, I felt the support team really grew larger, increased in size, and the technical expertise decreased, which makes sense because the larger the team, the less experience each individual can have. However, the faster you answer and the less frustrated users you have. In my case, when I contact support, it is really for technical matters or very specific technical issues that I could not find any solution for, and I know it is not always an easy task because I have been working on Braze for years. In my case, I have noticed that it is not always straightforward to have a solution. For how long have I used the solution? I have been using Braze for eight years. What do I think about the stability of the solution? Braze has presented stability issues. What do I think about the scalability of the solution? Braze's scalability is very good. How are customer service and support? Braze's customer service is faster to reply and pretty helpful. Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch? In other companies, I have used Adobe Campaign, Brevo, Sendinblue, Batch for push notifications, Airship, and Actito, which is a French CRM tool. In almost all the companies where I was a CRM team lead or head of CRM, I managed to change the CRM tool and migrate to another one, and it was always Braze that won the request for proposal, simply because they performed the best during the technical demonstration. The fact that I was already certified and I knew the tool very well also helped a lot in the decision, even though I was always open to switching to another tool, especially because of the pricing. What was our ROI? Braze has allowed us to reduce the time of creation and setup by half for campaign creation, for at least one-off campaigns and automated workflows, which is really great. When it took one hour to create a campaign from start to finish before, it now takes only thirty minutes. Regarding performance measurement, it is really a game changer; it takes literally three minutes to check and write analysis about a Canvas, a campaign, or a segment's behavior. It is not only a matter of time-saving but also of data enablement; all of this data were not always available before in legacy or previous tools, so having them in Braze is really valuable. What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing? Braze is a pretty expensive tool, but because it is also a very qualitative one. Given the higher price than other tools, we would expect in that case the tool to be very fluent, one hundred percent perfect, with no bugs and no latency, and that is not always the case. I have a mitigated experience when it comes to pricing. Which other solutions did I evaluate? We always evaluated other options and compared Braze to Salesforce Marketing Cloud, Brevo, Batch, and Emarsys. What other advice do I have? I would advise new users to practice, train, and get certified. This review has been rated eight out of ten. Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
I love how Braze AI Decisioning Studio™ seamlessly integrates, making my life easier. It makes things quicker and more efficient, reducing the demand on tech resources. It empowers me to make decisions faster, which means I don't have to lean as much on others for support, making everyone happier. nothing. I use Braze AI Decisioning Studio™ to make decisions faster and more efficiently without relying heavily on tech support. It integrates seamlessly, saving resources and making me happier.